World's Smallest Political Quiz

This is a very interesting project. Check out the quiz here

Update 1/5/2009 - I neglected to add my results in this quiz. My views are right in the middle of the Libertarian area of the scale.

BHO's Date Night

Oh please!!!

The Obamas made a recent trip to NYC for "date night" all at the taxpayers expense for dinner and a show. Now assuming the Obamas picked up the tab for the dinner and show, the U.S. taxpayers are still out the $40,000 per hour it takes to operate Air Force One not to mention the costs of security, staff transportation, press transportation and a host of other expenses associated with this little jaunt.

I find it amazing that the president that promised "change" would take this step. Especially when there are Americans that are having trouble purchasing basic necessities like food and shelter. Hell, I know I can't afford to take anyone's wife to NYC for date night even if I fly there using frequent flier miles. I'm lucky if I can squeeze in a pizza once a week or so.

And what about the nasty "carbon footprint" this little trip created? Now, now Mr. President, I thought that green was the way to go. Surely a flight to NYC on a 747 for a date night is not a responsible use of this country's resources.

Sotomayor, a Racist on SCOTUS

Let's begin the entry by allowing me to state that I am white. My ancestors came from England, Ireland, Wales and Germany. So, I am a true Euro-mix of nationalities. I have one line of my family that I have traced back to 1775 in the then colony of New York. My most recent immigrant is my great-grandfather who arrived at the turn of the 20th century from Ireland.

Being white, I am proud of my heritage. However, I cannot express said pride without being labeled as a racist. Should I make a public statement that a white male is smarter than someone from another race, I am labeled a bigot.

Now we have our newest nominee to the SCOTUS who happens to be Hispanic and has gone on record as stating "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Now I must ask, why does this double standard exist? If I were to make a statement that a wise WHITE male would reach a better conclusion than a Latina, I am racist. If I start an organization name National Society for the Advancement of Caucasions or the Caucasion College Fund, I am racist. Even the POTUS spent more time in his campaign focusing on being half black and not half white.

To me, it is apparent that Sotomayor is not suited to sit on the bench of our highest court or any other court for that matter. There should not be a white view, a black view, or any other partisan view from the bench. The job of the SCOTUS is to review the laws and eliminate those that do not abide by our Constitution. Nothing more, nothing less.

40 Reasons to Support Gun Control | Gather

40 Reasons to Support Gun Control

1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, and Chicago cops need guns.
2. Washington DC's low murder rate of 80.6 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Arlington, VA's high murder rate of 1.6 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.
3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."
4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994, are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.
5. We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.
6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.
7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.
8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.
9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense ? give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).
10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns and Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.
11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seatbelts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for spinal paralysis, a computer programmer for Y2K problems, and Sarah Brady [or Sheena Duncan, Adele Kirsten, Peter Storey, etc.] for firearms expertise.
12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1791, refers to the National Guard, which was created by an act of Congress in 1903.
13. The National Guard, funded by the federal government, occupying property leased to the federal government, using weapons owned by the federal government, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a state militia.
14. These phrases," right of the people peaceably to assemble," "right of the people to be secure in their homes," "enumeration's herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people," and "The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people," all refer to individuals, but "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" refers to the state.
15. We don't need guns against an oppressive government, because the Constitution has internal safeguards, but we should ban and seize all guns, thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendments to that Constitution.
16. Rifles and handguns aren't necessary to national defense, which is why the army has millions of them.
17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns, because they serve no military purpose, and private citizens shouldn't have "assault rifles," because they are military weapons.
18. The ready availability of guns today, with waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, et cetera, is responsible for recent school shootings,compared to the lack of school shootings in the 40's, 50's and 60's, which resulted from the availability of guns at hardware stores, surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, mail order, et cetera.
19. The NRA's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, and the anti-gun lobby's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign is responsible social activity.
20. Guns are so complex that special training is necessary to use them properly, and so simple to use that they make murder easy.
21. A handgun, with up to 4 controls, is far too complex for the typical adult to learn to use, as opposed to an automobile that only has 20.
22. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men but a woman with a gun is "an accident waiting to happen" and gun makers' advertisements aimed at women are "preying on their fears."
23. Ordinary people in the presence of guns turn into slaughtering butchers but revert to normal when the weapon is removed.
24. Guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows.
25. A majority of the population supports gun control, just like a majority of the population supported owning slaves.
26. A self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a "weapon of mass destruction" or an "assault weapon."
27. Most people can't be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
28. The right of online pornographers to exist cannot be questioned because it is constitutionally protected by the Bill of Rights, but the use of handguns for self defense is not really protected by the Bill of Rights.
29. Free speech entitles one to own newspapers, transmitters, computers, and typewriters, but self-defense only justifies bare hands.
30. The ACLU is good because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution, and the NRA is bad, because it defends other parts of the Constitution.
31. Charlton Heston as president of the NRA is a shill who should be ignored, but Michael Douglas as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc. is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit.
32. Police operate with backup within groups, which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do "civilians" who must face criminals alone and therefore need less ammunition.
33. We should ban "Saturday Night Specials" and other inexpensive guns because it's not fair that poor people have access to guns too.
34. Police officers, who qualify with their duty weapons once or twice a year, have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.
35. Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
36. Citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.
37. "Assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why the police need them but "civilians" do not.
38. When Microsoft pressures its distributors to give Microsoft preferential promotion, that's bad; but when the Federal government pressures cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson, that's good.
39. Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapon.
40. When Handgun Control, Inc., says they want to "keep guns out of the wrong hands," they don't mean you. Really.

Under fire, Pelosi gets backing from fellow Democrats

Under fire, Pelosi gets backing from fellow Democrats: "A CNN poll Monday found 48 percent of those polled disapprove of the way Pelosi is handling her job, versus 39 percent who approve."

What a surprise, the Democrats are backing yet another liar. Remember this is the same party that backed Clinton over the whole Monica fiacso.

What the FUCK??

As any reader of this blog knows, I am not a supporter of Obama in any way shape or form. His recent actions with the king of Saudi Arabia is a prime example of why this man is unfit to hold the office he does.

Since when does the President of the U.S., the leader of the free world bow to a foreign leader? This is bullshit! We are not subjects of any foreign country or leader. That was resolved after the Revolutionary War.

Now the White House states that it was not a "bow" but merely Obama bending down to grasp the hand of the king. Once again, I call bullshit. Take a look a the video and judge for yourself.

Obama bowing

Columbine - 10 years later

I find it interesting that some of the parents of those killed in the Columbine attack are now crowing that it is time to increase the restrictions on purchasing firearms. Tom and Linda Mauser who had a son killed in the tragedy now "honor" their son's memory by campaigning for stricter controls.

Lets take a look at some facts behind the guns used that fateful day and how they were obtained.

The guns: Intratec TEC-DC9 pistol, Hi-Point 9mm Carbine, Savage 67H pump-action shotgun, and a Savage 311-D 12-gauge shotgun.

How obtained: The carbine and both shotguns were purchased by Robyn Anderson, a friend of Klebold and Harris, bought the shotguns and the Hi-Point 9mm Carbine at The Tanner Gun Show in December of 1998 from non FFL sellers. The TEC-DC9 was purchased by the shooters from a friend.

Legality: The purchases by Anderson were LEGAL purchases at the time under Colorado law as she had reached the age of 18. However, when she then transferred the guns to Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the purchase became an illegal straw purchase. The TEC-DC9 was purchased from a friend who apparently knew the ages of the shooters but still sold them the pistol for $500. A quck Internet check shows that one can legally purchase a TEC-DC9 today for under $250. The inflated price would lead one to believe that the seller knew that the kids would not be able to purchase the gun legally hence the increase in the price for the illegal sale.

While Columbine was a tragedy for the students and their families, it was also a tragedy for our 2A rights as well. It has become a rally point for all of those who seek to ignore or destroy our 2A rights.

The fact is all four of the guns used in this shooting were acquired ILLEGALLY. Further evidence that those bent on destruction will find a willing partner to supply them their arms. Although the gun grabbers state they are not after our "hunting" firearms, using this incident as their battle cry only further exposes the truth. The two shot guns are typically used for hunting purposes, the 9mm carbine is a pistol round in a rifle, not really a hunting weapon but great for knocking holes in paper. Even the TEC-DC9 is only a semi-automatic pistol even though it received special attention in the 1994 AWB.